Chicago Feds. Evans leger med ilden

Dette er et interview med Chicago Feds. Charles Evans fra Wall Street Journal. Fremhævelserne er vores. Artiklen kan læses i sin originale form her:

Fed Official Issues Call for Aggressive Action

Chicago President Evans Proposes Raising Inflation Target Above 2% in Effort to Revive the Economy

CHICAGO—Charles Evans, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, called for the Fed to do more to charge up the economy, including a new program of U.S. Treasury bond purchases and possibly a declaration that it wants inflation to rise for a time beyond its informal 2% target.
Jon Hilsenrath tells Simon Constable and David Weidner why the Federal Reserve may be ready to raise its target for inflation in an effort to stimulate the faltering U.S. economy. Plus, stocks and gold soar and Eebee takes aim at babies.
“In the last several months I’ve stared at our unemployment forecast and come to the conclusion that it’s just not coming down nearly as quickly as it should,” Mr. Evans said Monday in an interview with The Wall Street Journal. “This is a far grimmer forecast than we ought to have,” he added. As result, he said, he favors “much more [monetary] accommodation than we’ve put in place.”
The comments are significant because Mr. Evans tends to reflect the broad center of gravity at the central bank. His prescription for aggressive action, though not uniformly held by his colleagues, suggests a shift in the mood at the Fed.
On the heels of remarks by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and New York Federal Reserve Bank President William Dudley, it is likely to reinforce a growing conviction among investors that the Fed will restart a bond-buying program when it meets Nov. 2 and 3.
It also suggests Fed deliberations are going beyond resuming bond-buying plans to contemplating new strategies for talking about inflation and for communicating the Fed’s stance to the public.
In recent months, Mr. Evans, a 52-year-old economist who has led the Chicago Fed since 2007, has become increasingly worried that the U.S. is falling into what’s known as a “liquidity trap,” in which banks don’t lend and firms don’t invest. He has grown frustrated with a lack of progress in bringing down unemployment and is now forecasting inflation of 1% in 2012 and below 1.5% in 2013, well below his own 2% goal.
The Fed is now considering whether to add to its $2.3-trillion portfolio of securities and loans by ramping up purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds, in an effort to drive down long-term interest rates and boost growth. Mr. Evans says he favors that, but worries that alone “would not be enough” to address his concerns.
The Fed also needs to push down “real” interest rates, nominal interest rates minus inflation, to induce households and businesses to part with savings and borrow and spend more, he said.
‘There is nobody who would want, in any way, to lose what Paul Volcker won for the American people by fighting inflation and achieving price stability. But the current circumstances are really extraordinary.’
–Charles Evans, President of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago
One way to push real interest rates lower is to get inflation higher. The Fed might aim to overshoot its informal 2% target for a time to make up for lost ground, Mr. Evans said. “That is a potentially useful policy tool at this point and I definitely think we should study it more,” Mr. Evans said.
Mr. Dudley last week also raised the possibility that the Fed might try to catch up when inflation falls short of its objective by allowing it to run over the target by an equal amount later.
Mr. Bernanke has ruled out raising the inflation target altogether. He hasn’t weighed in on this catch-up approach for the U.S., though in the past he has recommended such an approach for Japan. The Fed’s policy statement in September noted that inflation was running below its objective.
Any further move to boost inflation would be highly controversial both inside and outside the Fed, which has preached the virtues of less inflation ever since then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker pushed interest rates higher in the 1980s, starting a deep recession, to wring out double-digit inflation.
“There is nobody who would want, in any way, to lose what Paul Volcker won for the American people by fighting inflation and achieving price stability,” Mr. Evans said. “But the current circumstances are really extraordinary. It seems to me if we could somehow get lower real interest rates so that the amount of excess savings that is taking place relative to investment is lowered, that would be one channel for stimulating the economy.”
The idea espoused by Mr. Evans and Mr. Dudley is known as “price-level targeting.” Inflation is measured as the change in the consumer price index or other price indexes. Rather than target an annual inflation rate of 2%, the Fed would target an inflation index level. So if the consumer price index fell short of the level the Fed targeted one year, it might get back to that level the next year by overshooting a little. It could be a challenge for the Fed to explain such a strategy, and to convince the public that it wouldn’t allow inflation to get completely out of hand.
Mr. Evans isn’t currently among the five regional Fed bank presidents with a vote on monetary policy. He gets his turn next year.